Rom. J. Biophys. 2002
12(3-4):83-89
THE BLOOD VISCOSITY IN
PATIENTS WITH DEEP VENOUS THROMBOTIC RISK UNDER LOW-MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN
TREATMENT
N. CEAMITRU*, ILEANA ION*,
V. LUPESCU**, CRISTINA CEAMITRU*, CECILIA ADUMITRESI*, VIOLETA SAPIRA*
*Department of Pathophysiology, ** Department of Orthopedic
Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, “OVIDIUS”
Abstract. Prophylaxis of deep venous
thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin has been studied in many clinical
trials but the effect on the hemorheological parameters is steel uncertain. Our
study checks the hemorheologic effects of administration of LMWH in
thromboembolism prevention measuring the whole blood viscosity with a
cone/plate viscometer at high shear rate (600 – 1125 sec–1). The
study was performed on a group of sixteen patients, hospitalized in orthopedic
surgery department for hip fractures. Hematocrit, fibrinogen and whole blood
viscosity were measured before operation, immediately after it and seven days
later. We found that LMWH decrease hematocrit, fibrinogen and whole blood
viscosity at a high shear rate. The decrease of blood viscosity could be one of
the most important effects of LMWH in deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis.
Key words: blood viscosity,
hemorheology, thrombosis, low-molecular weight heparin.
INTRODUCTION
The
risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with limb fractures which
compulsorily required surgical intervention is known to be high [2]. Thrombosis
is a naturally occurring physiologic process. Under normal circumstances, a
physiologic balance is present between factors that promote and retard
coagulation. A disturbance in this equilibrium may result in the coagulation
process occurring at an inopportune time or location or in an excessive manner.
Virchow described a triad of factors of venous stasis, endothelial damage, and
a hypercoagulable state that are associated with the equilibrium process.
Venous stasis can occur as a result of anything that slows or obstructs the
flow of venous blood. This results in an increase in viscosity and the formation
of microthrombi, which are not washed away by fluid movement; the thrombus that
forms may then grow and propagate. Endothelial (intimal) damage within the
blood vessel may be intrinsic or secondary to external trauma. It may result
from accidental injury or surgical insult. A hypercoagulable state can occur
due to a biochemical imbalance between circulating factors. However, the
optimal duration of prophylaxis with anticoagulant agents in these conditions
is unknown. Because low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) derived from heparin
by different methods of depolymerization have a better bioavailability at low
doses, they become the elective drugs in this treatment [3].
The
aim of this study is to cheek the hemorheologic effects of administration of
LMWH in thromboembolism prevention. LMWH belongs to a class of anticoagulants
termed glycosaminoglycans. LMWH products are manufactured from unfractionated
heparin (UFH) by either chemical or enzymatic depolymerization, consequently
their molecular weights are in the range of about 4,000 – 6,000 daltons,
one-third the size of VFH. LMWH exhibit a preferential effect on activated
factor X with fewer effects on platelets than standard heparin [10, 11]. These
compounds are less able to inhibit thrombin formation. A major pharmacological
benefit of LMWH is a reduction in anti-factor IIa activity with preservation of
anti-factor Xa activity. This preferential effect on factor Xa along with fewer
effects on thrombin and platelets were thought to be properties that might lead
to less bleeding complications [4, 8].
Whole
blood viscosity, hematocrit, and fibrinogen were studied in a group of patients
with hip fracture before and during subcutaneous LMWH treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
The
study was performed on a group of sixteen patients, hospitalized in the
orthopedic surgery department for hip fractures. The blood samples were
collected before operation, immediately after it and seven days later. In all
this period the patients received subcutaneous treatment with LMWH to prevent
the risk of deep venous thrombosis.
Every
time, the blood was collected by venipuncture and 4.5 ml of it was drawn and
transferred to a polypropylene tube containing EDTA. The following parameters
were determined:
•
hematocrit – from a sample jf blood collected with EDTA anticoagulant using
microcentrifugation procedure, five minutes at 10,000 g;
•
fibrinogen – from a sample of 5 ml blood collected with sodium citrate
anticoagulant using a spectrophotometer at 546 nm;
•
whole blood viscosity – from a sample of 4.5 ml blood collected with EDTA
anticoagulant using a DV‑II+ Brookfield Cone/Plate viscometer. The blood
viscosity was measured at a different shear rate in a range of 600 – 1125 sec–1.
The
DV-II+
Fig. 1 – The DV-II+
The
resistance to the rotation of the cone produces a torque that is proportional
to the shear stress in the fluid. The amount of torque is indicated either on a
dial or digital display, depending on the model. This reading is easily
converted to absolute centipoise units (mPas) from pre-calculated range charts.
Alternatively, viscosity can be calculated from the known geometric constants
of the cone, the rate of rotation, and the stress related torque.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The
mean values of hematocrit, fibrinogen and viscosity are presented in the tables
and in the figures below.
The
whole blood viscosity mean values (Table 1 and Fig. 2) are measured at a high
shear rate (600 – 1125 sec–1), which means a range of interval
between 80 and 150 rotations per minute.
Table
1
The
mean values of whole blood viscosity
Fig. 2. – The representation of the whole blood viscosity (mean values).
Blood
behaves like a non-Newtonian fluid whose viscosity varies with the shear rate.
The non-Newtonian characteristics of blood come from the presence of cells (red
blood cells), which make blood a suspension of particles [5].
Hemorheological
properties of the blood include whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity. hematocrit, red blood cells deformability and aggregation,
and fibrinogen concentration in the plasma. Although a number of parameters
such as pressure, lumen diameter, whole blood viscosity, compliance of vessels,
peripheral vascular resistance are well-known physiological parameters that
affect the blood flow; the whole blood viscosity is also an important key
physiological parameter.
Before
operation and without any LMWH treatment, the values are significantly higher
than immediately after it and seven days after operations. In all this time,
patients were treated with a single subcutaneous dose of LMWH as prevention for
deep venous thrombosis. LMWH led to a significant reduction in whole blood
viscosity. This reduction is concordant with hematocrit decreased values and
fibrinogen values. No bleeding accident was reported during all this period.
Table
2
The
mean values of fibrinogen and hematocrit
Fig. 3. – The representation of the hematoerit (mean values).
The
hematocrit mean values (Table 2 and Fig. 3) are decreased from the beginning at
the lower rate of the normal range. After operations and seven days later thc values present a slower tendency to decrease but with no
significant statistic values. Hematocrit is the most important determinant of
the whole blood viscosity [6]. The effect of hematocrit on the blood viscosity
has been well documented. All studies have shown that the viscosity of whole
blood varies directly with the hematocrit at cell concentration above 10% [7].
The
fibrinogen mean values (Table I and Fig. 4) are increased before operations and
after as a consequence of trauma and the associated inflammatory process. Seven days after operations the fibrinogen values became normal,
but at the highest values of the normal range. Our result is concordant
with recent studies [1] which show decreased values of fibrinogen and blood
viscosity six weeks after acute phase of a deep venous thrombosis.
Fig. 4. – The representation of fibrinogen (mean values).
CONCLUSIONS
We
found that LMWH decreases the hematocrit, fibrinogen and whole blood viscosity
at a high shear rate. The decrease of blood viscosity due to LMWH is one of its
most important effects in deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis.
LMWH,
which selectively inhibit the Xa factor [9] with minimal risk of hemorrhage,
seems to offer new possibilities in the prevention and treatment of deep venous
thrombosis having also an antithrombotic effect.
The
LMWH are highly effective, with a good safety profile, and require no blood
test monitoring. This, together with their ease of administration, means that
the majority of deep venous thrombosis patients can now be treated on an
ambulatory basis, without the need for hospital.
REFERENCES
1. ALT, E., S. BANAY, R. KOPPENSTEINER, Blood rheology in deep venous thrombosis-relation to persistent and transient risk factors, Thromb. Res., 2002, 107, 101–107.
2. BERGMANN, J.F., I. MAHE, Prevention of deep venous thrombosis in medical patients, Ann. Med. Interne, 2000, 151, 207–214.
3. BERGQVIST, D., G. BENONI, 0. BJORGELL, H. FREDIN, U. FIEDLUNDH, S. NICOLAS, P. NILSSON, G. NYLANDER, Low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement, N. Engl. J. Med., 1996, 335, 696–700.
4. BUCKLEY, M.M., E.M. SORKIN, Enoxaparin. A review of its pharmacology and clinical applications in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, Drugs, 1992, 44, 465–497.
5. CHO, Y.I., K.R., KENSEY, Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on hemodynamics of diseased arterial flows. Part 1, Steady flow, Biorheol., 1991, 28, 241–262.
6. CINAR, Y., G. DEMIR, M. PAC, A.B. CINAR, Effect of hematocrit on blood pressure via hyperviscosity, Am. J. Hypertens., 1999, 12, 739–743.
7. GUYTON, A.C., Textbook of medical physiology, 5th
edition, W.B. Saunders Company,
8. LENSING, A.W.A., M.H. PRINS, B.L. DAVIDSON, J. HIRSH, Treatment of deep vein thrombosis with low molecular weight heparins. A meta-analysis, Arch. Intern. Med., l995, 155, 601–607.
9. MANNARINO, E., L. PASQUALINI, S. INNOCENTE, U. ORLANDI, V. SCRICCIOLO, R. LOMBARDINI, Efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparins in management of intermittent claudication, Angiology, 1991, 42, 1–7.
10. SIRAGUSA, S., B. COSMI, F. PIOVELLA, J. HIRSH, J.S. GINSBERG, Low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism: results of a meta-analysis, Am. J. Med., 1996, 100, 269–277.
11. VERSTRAETE, M., Pharmacotherapeutic aspects of unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins, Drugs, 1990, 40, 498–530.